USA

USDA’s latest packers and stockyards rule will increase costs

Poultry

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced its “Fair and Competitive Livestock and Poultry Markets” proposed rule that would attempt to change the legal standard that parties must demonstrate harm to competition and make it easier to sue and win under the Packers and Stockyards Act (PSA).

Posted on Jul 02 ,00:05

USDA’s latest packers and stockyards rule will increase costs

In response to the announcement of the proposed rule, National Chicken Council (NCC) Interim President Gary Kushner released the following statement:

"This latest rulemaking retreads a failed proposal from more than a decade ago, which was written by a plaintiff’s lawyer who made his money suing poultry companies. This current facelift to the ‘Harm to Competition’ rule would open the floodgates to frivolous and costly litigation. This was largely confirmed today by Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter during the unveiling of the rule when he said that he hopes plaintiffs ‘will bring a PSA case, or two, or 20’ against poultry processing companies.

"Eight different federal circuit courts of appeal have addressed the key issue underpinning the proposed rule-the need to establish injury to competition to demonstrate a violation-and they have uniformly and resoundingly rejected the position advanced by USDA in this proposed rule. USDA participated directly in many of those cases. Rather than accept the courts’ decisions, however, Secretary Vilsack and this administration are trying to circumvent Congress and misuse the rulemaking process to achieve what they have not won in court and what Congress has never authorized – all under the guise of somehow lowering costs for consumers.

"Today’s livestock and poultry contracting and marketing practices are already and remain regulated by USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service, which administers and enforces the Packers and Stockyards Act to protect farmers, ranchers and consumers.

"This proposal is ill-advised, would inflict billions of dollars of economic harm on American agriculture, line the pockets of plaintiffs’ lawyers, exceed USDA’s statutory authority, and increase costs for consumers who are already struggling with inflation in most of their everyday lives".

 NEWSLETTER - Stay informed with the latest news!

Comments





Similar articles

SCOTLAND

QMS highlights whole supply chain approach key to high red meat standards

Chefs across the supply chain - from Buzzworks Life (Scotch Beef Club members and Ayrshire’...


Read more Read more
AUSTRALIA

Australia: Maintained fodder supply leads to MSA success

The Beechers run a mix of Angus, Hereford, and Angus-Hereford cross cattle on their farm at Churc...


Read more Read more
UK

British Lion unveils Version 3 of cutting-edge processing Code

The new standard embraces the latest food safety advances, including 64 new criteria, and recogni...


Read more Read more
Websolutions by Angular Software and SpiderClass